The Democratic ex-mayor of Pennsylvania’s third-largest city, convicted earlier this year on 47 corruption-related charges, is seeking the public’s help to pay his legal bills, The Allentown Morning Call reported.
Former Allentown Mayor Ed Pawlowski had been charged with trading city contracts for campaign contributions. along with “dozens” of fraud, bribery and attempted extortion counts — and with lying to FBI investigators.
Of the initial 54 counts against him, Pawlowski was found guilty of 47 in March and was forced to vacate the mayor’s office.
Thank you for your friendship and support over these past years. Ed and I could not have made it this far without your notes, hugs, and prayers. Please keep it up! We maintain innocence and will fight this battle to the… https://t.co/xzOEJG6aJ5
— Ed Pawlowski (@Ed_Pawlowski) August 7, 2018
Allentown’s City Council then chose Democrat Ray O’Connell to succeed the four-term Pawlowski on an interim basis until the the 2019 city elections, WFMZ-69 reported.– READ MORE
[divider][/divider]President Donald Trump is threatening to take away the security clearances of a number of former senior intelligence and security officers who have been extremely critical of him. Most Americans were unaware that any ex-officials continued to hold clearances after they retired and the controversy has inevitably raised the question why that should be so. Unfortunately, there is no simple answer.
A security clearance is granted to a person but it is also linked to “need to know” in terms of what kind of information should or could be accessed, which means that when you are no longer working as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency you don’t necessarily need to know anything about China’s spying on the United States. Or do you? If you transition into a directorship or staff position of a major intelligence or security contractor, which many retirees do, you might need to retain the qualification for your job, which makes the clearance an essential component in the notorious revolving door whereby government officials transit to the private sector and then directly lobby their former colleagues to keep the flow of cash coming.
At top levels among the beltway bandit companies, where little work is actually done, some make the case that you have to remain “well informed” to function properly. The fact is that many top-level bureaucrats do retain their clearances for those nebulous reasons and also sometimes as a courtesy. Some have even received regular briefings from the CIA and the office of the Director of National intelligence even though they hold no government positions. A few very senior ex-officials have also been recalled by congress or the White House to provide testimony on particular areas of expertise or on past operations, which can legitimately require a clearance, though it such cases one can be granted on a temporary basis to cover a specific issue.
The problem arises when former officials use their clearances as bona fides to enhance their marketability for non-clearance jobs in the media or corporate world, particularly when those individuals are criticizing current government policies and behaving in a partisan fashion regarding specific candidates for office. Donald Trump was especially assailed by former officials John Brennan, James Clapper, Michael Hayden and Michael Morell before the 2016 election, all of whom continue to attack him currently, most particularly for the recent meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin. During the 2016 campaign, Morell, who openly supported Hillary Clinton and is the designated intelligence on-air contributor for CBS news, deliberately linked the fact that he was ex-CIA Acting Director to his assertion that Trump was somehow an “unwitting agent of the Russian Federation” to establish his credibility. That type of activity should be considered abusive and an exploitation of one’s former office. – READ MORE
[give_form id=”79809″]