Scientists: Trump’s Budget Will Limit Funds To Study ‘Microagressions’ And Build RoboSquirrels
The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology strongly denounced President Donald Trump’s budget proposal — released Tuesday — because it calls for big funding cuts for the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation.
“The president’s budget request, which would cut the National Institutes of Health’s funding by 22 percent to $26.9 billion, would make funding new research grants a near impossibility,” said Benjamin Corb, public affairs director for the scientific group, in a statement sent to The Daily Caller.
“The National Science Foundation would also see a reduction its budget with the request calling for an 11 percent cut, bringing its budget down to $6.7 billion,” Corb also said.
“President Donald Trump’s fiscal year 2018 budget, if enacted, would significantly damage the nation’s role as the global leader of research and innovation.”
The National Institutes of Health issues a large number of research grants each year.
In 2016, for instance, a trio of researchers at the taxpayer-funded University of Northern Colorado received a $402,249 grant from the National Institutes of Health for a plan to use text messages to ask 150 dazed and confused college students how heavy marijuana use affects their academic performance and academic motivation — over a three-year period.
In 2014, the National Institutes of Health provided $433,577 to a group of researchers whose goal was to determine if kids who watch top-grossing G-rated and PG-rated movies are confused because non-fat characters make fun of fat characters but, at the same time, the films promote soda consumption and sedentary behaviors.
The National Science Foundation issues a large number of similar research grants.
For example, the National Science Foundation shelled out $548,459 in taxpayer cash for an ongoing project at the University of Michigan which videotapes male engineering students working in campus laboratories to determine if the males are causing female engineering students to experience “microaggressions.”
Another ongoing research projected funded by the National Science Foundation — to the tune of almost $300,000 — involves an investigation into aspects of engineering culture which serve as “impediments” to increased numbers of gay, lesbian and transgender students. The researchers who received the generous $299,998 grant from the National Science Foundation hope to find ways to train engineering professors to become “LGBTQ-affirming.”
And, of course, back in 2012, San Diego State University and the University of California, Davis received a $325,000 National Science Foundation grant to build an artificial robotic squirrel.
“Overall, the president’s budget would bring total federal investments in scientific research spending to a 40-year low,” said Corb, the spokesman for the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Corb is not a scientist himself. According to his LinkedIn page, he possesses a bachelor’s degree in political science from American University.
The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology strongly denounced President Donald Trump's budget proposal -- released Tuesday -- because it calls for big funding cuts for the Natio
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected].
True Pundit has partnered with long-time esteemed conservative news site the Daily Caller to offer benefits to the news startup’s news gathering and intelligence arsenal. Through the partnership, launched today, TruePundit.com readers will be able to likewise enjoy full Daily Caller content on our news site, mobile site and the True Pundit app. The Daily…