After expressing her excitement to sign a bill banning biological males from women’s sports, Republican South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem is wavering in her support for the legislation due to pressure from groups in South Dakota, the Daily Caller News Foundation has learned.
Noem said as recently as March 8 that she was “excited” to sign H.B. 1217, a bill that not only bans biological males from participating in women’s sports but also establishes that there are only two biological sexes (male and female) and that there are “inherent” differences between men and women.
The bill was sent to Noem’s desk on March 10, but the governor has since suggested that she may not sign it.
Noem’s office did not directly address why she is wavering in her support for the bill, but confirmed that the governor has not made up her mind on whether she will sign it.
“Governor Noem is still weighing 106 pieces of legislation that have action due next Friday, and that is one of them,” Noem’s communications director Ian Fury told the DCNF Friday morning.
“We’re still looking at it, and I probably, in the next two to three days, will come to a decision,” Noem said in a Thursday interview with the Argus Leader. “It’s a complicated bill, even in that there are parts of it that aren’t written so well.”
The bill is one of many aimed at protecting women and children introduced in 2021 thus far. A review conducted by Axios found that GOP lawmakers have introduced 61 pieces of legislation in at least 25 states that criminalize gender transition surgeries for children or prevent biological males from participating in women’s sports.
The latest POLITICO/Morning Consult poll found that 53% of registered voters do not support biological males competing in women’s sports.
If Noem decides to veto the bill, two-thirds of both the House and the Senate would be required to vote for an override — and groups like the Greater Sioux Falls Area Chamber of Commerce and the Sioux Falls Sports Authority argue that the law could negatively effect South Dakota’s economy.
When the North Carolina legislature passed a bill in 2016 banning local governments from requiring businesses to allow trans persons to use their preferred bathroom, dozens of events were cancelled in protest, such as a weekend Bruce Springsteen show.
“Some things are more important than a rock show and this fight against prejudice and bigotry — which is happening as I write — is one of them,” Springsteen said at the time. “It is the strongest means I have for raising my voice in opposition to those who continue to push us backwards instead of forwards.”
The American Principles Project has both publicly and privately encouraged Noem to sign the bill and engaged in dialogue with legislators across South Dakota regarding H.B. 1217.
Jon Schweppe, APP’s Director of Policy and Government Affairs, told the DCNF that he began hearing from legislators and policy organizations that Noem was facing pressure not to sign the bill from South Dakota groups after she tweeted her support on March 8.
The governor faces pressure from the NCAA, the South Dakota Chamber of Commerce, and an Amazon plant in Sioux Falls, which is “quietly threatening” to leave over the bill, the APP leader told the DCNF.
Schweppe referenced Noem’s comments to the Argus Leader, claiming that “she’s already kind of backtracking and preparing the stage for a veto.”
“I’m hoping she doesn’t do that because she will destroy her political career,” Schweppe told the DCNF. “She’s trying to become president or have a national profile.”
Representative South Dakota state Rep. Rhonda Milstead, one of H.B. 1217’s sponsor, told the DCNF Friday morning that opposition and pressure against this bill was “inevitable,” but could have perhaps have been avoided if Noem had signed it as soon as it got to her desk.
“I think the reality of it is that if you stand up for the right thing, and this is the right thing, that good will come of it,” she said. “That bully tactics aren’t gonna work if you hold your ground. And that’s what those are, bully tactics.”
Milstead speculated that Noem is working on some language changes that she will require before she will sign the bill — and Milstead argued that this is not Noem’s purview.
“She’s the executive branch, the legislature is the one that passes laws,” Milstead said. “So if she wants to change the language, it has nothing to do with style and form. It has everything to do with content, context.”
“That’s not appropriate,” she added. “It’s really going outside of the powers of the branch. That’s not what the executive branch is for.”
The bill is strongly supported by both Republican and faith-based groups in South Dakota, such as the South Dakota Catholic Conference and the Family Heritage Alliance Action.
“We have been encouraging her to stand strong and follow through with her signature,” Norman Woods, executive director for the Family Heritage Alliance Action, told the DCNF.
“We have been asking her to hold the line and protect women’s sports here in South Dakota,” he added.