True Pundit

Politics World

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange threatens to sue Mike Rogers on ‘day one’ if he’s picked to lead FBI

Follow on FacebookFollow on Twitter

“WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange threatens to sue Mike Rogers on ‘day one’ if he’s picked to lead FBI” by Daniel Chaitin.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange on Thursday threatened to sue former Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., on “day one” if he is chosen to replace James Comey as director of the FBI.

There were multiple reports Thursday saying Rogers, a former FBI official and former head of the House Intelligence Committee, is in consideration to be chosen as the Trump administration’s nominee to head the FBI.

Follow on FacebookFollow on Twitter

  • OutragedYT

    Sure all Asante has to do is show up in Federal court in Washington DC.

  • DD More

    What ever your opinion of Assange is, we might want to question Rogers a little more closely on where and who HE gets facts from.

    During that interview, Rogers said in response to then-President-elect Trump’s support of WikiLeaks that he needs “someone to explain to him who Julian Assange is.”

    According to the CNN transcript, he then said:
    “I understand that. I’m not sure how well briefed he is. Somebody needs to march into his office and explain to him who Julian Assange is. By that tweet, I don’t think he knows. I think if he knew all of the details — this person is wanted for rape of a minor. He is hiding in the basement of an embassy because he is a fugitive from justice, number one. Number two, he has released information harmful to the United States that I do believe jeopardize soldiers in the field.

    Rogers made the comment the same day former CIA counterterrorism official Phil Mudd said Assange was a “pedophile” on CNN’s “New Day.” WikiLeaks then threatened to sue CNN for defamation for the comment is said referred to allegations that Assange molested an eight-year-old girl in the Bahamas — something which Bahaman police say they had received a tip about but never identified a possible victim. “New Day” later pulled the clip, saying it regrets the “pedophile” assertion which lacked any evidence.

    Assange has resided in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London since 2012. He is wanted in Sweden on separate sexual allegations. Assange maintains that he is innocent but has expressed fear that he could be extradited to the United States for espionage should he leave the embassy.

    So ‘rape of a minor’ based on a ‘TIP’, but no victim. Wanted in Sweden, but no too much, as they have No Rape Charges Against Him, just wanted for questioning by a female ‘feminist agenda’ prosecutor on an unsigned warrant.

    The evidence in the Swedish Assange allegations was originally reviewed by the chief prosecutor in Stockholm who declared there was no case to answer. It was then taken up – as allowed in the Swedish system – by a second prosecutor, Marianne NY, who has a campaigning third wave feminist agenda.
    The European Arrest Warrant against Assange was signed not by any court, but by Marianne Ny. It was not on the basis that he was charged with any offence, but that he was wanted for questioning by the prosecutor.

    After 7 years, shouldn’t he have some facts or proof of ‘His Beliefs’?