True Pundit

Politics

These Two Tweets From John Podesta Show The Democratic Schizophrenia

FOLLOW US!
Follow on FacebookFollow on Twitter

John Podesta, former chairman of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, revealed the political left’s complicated opinion of former FBI Director James Comey.

Podesta tweeted Tuesday morning that the public was “getting mildly nauseous listening to Jim Comey,” only a few hours before President Donald Trump would fire him from the FBI.

 

Seven hours after his first post, Podesta tweeted directly at Trump—meaning the tweet would not appear to most of his Twitter followers, though it is publicly available—that he should “wait til Saturday night to massacre people investigating you.” The tweet alludes to when former Republican President Richard Nixon fired the Department of Justice’s special Watergate prosecutor Archibald Cox.

Podesta and other former Clinton operatives have long blamed Comey for not doing more to clear Clinton’s name during the election. Clinton herself said Comey’s public announcement of investigations contributed to her loss.

Comey sent a letter to Congress Oct. 28 declaring the FBI had discovered classified Clinton emails on the laptop of Anthony Weiner, the husband of Clinton aide Huma Abedin, contributed to her election loss.

“If the election had been on October 27, I would be your president,” Clinton said in a speech May 2.

The FBI issued a supplement Tuesday morning to Comey’s testimony before the Senate Committee on the Judiciary May 3, correcting that only two email chains discovered on Weiner’s laptop contained classified information.

“There are at least forces within the FBI that wanted [Clinton] to lose,” Podesta told Bloomberg News’ John Heilemann in February when asked about the FBI’s October surprise. “I’m not sure they really understood the alternative, but they wanted her to lose. I think that’s one possibility.”

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

FOLLOW US!
Follow on FacebookFollow on Twitter

  • DD More

    Poor John-John – “about the FBI’s October surprise. “I’m not sure they really understood the alternative, but they wanted her to lose. I think that’s one possibility.”

    Might be because they are Real Americans, loyal to the FBI Oath. Guys like FBI Anon.
    From a July, 2016, AskMeAnything – FBI Anon introduction – I am a person with intimate knowledge of the inner workings of the Clinton case. I will answer as many questions as I can without giving too much away.

    Chances of Hillary Clinton being indicted or brought to justice

    There is intense pressure for us not to do so. I am posting from a position of near anonymity and enough plausible deniability to evade prosecution, as we have all been given gag orders. There is enough for her and the entire government to be brought down. People do not realize how enormous this whole situation actually is. Whether she will be or not depends on how much info about others involved gets out, and there are a lot of people involved. She had SAP level programs on her server, which if made public, would literally cause an uprising and possibly foreign declarations of war. There already is enough to indict. Comey has been trying to stall because he does not want to face the Clinton Machine, as well as the rest of Washington D.C. But this case would explode into a million other cases if fully brought to light, and then we would be one agency competing against the entire government and a hoard of other interests. It is a very tense and uncomfortable position. What Lynch is saying is she will accept whatever they do and make her determination as she will. Nothing about her responsibilities has changed, she is simply trying to keep her hide intact.

    SAPs
    All I can tell you about the SAPs is HRC had them, and she did not have proper authority to have any of them. They were leaked to her by someone, and she did sell them to overseas donors. Possessing them alone makes her guilty of treason. Sec. [of State] CAN have access. That does not mean he/she WILL. SAP is granted on a need to know basis, and HRC did not have any need to know any of the programs on her server.

    The Clinton Foundation (CF)
    The real point of interest is the Clinton Foundation, not the e-mail server. We received the server from Benghazi, then from the server we found data on the CF. Then we realized the situation is much worse than previously thought. Killing HRC would not cause this problem to go away. The problem is with the Clinton Foundation as I mentioned, which you should just imagine as a massive spider web of connections and money laundering implicating hundreds of high-level people. Though I do not have a high opinion of Hillary, she is just a piece -albeit a big piece – of this massive [horrible situation]. Obama is loosely tied to the CF, but much more tied in with the same people who donate to the CF. BC likely wanted LL to focus on the e-mail server and shy away from prosecuting the foundation. [The Foundation] Sold influence, intel, favors, and people to anyone willing to pay.

    (next comments from continuation thread)
    The people under the magnifying glass do have an affinity for children. Pedophiles and sex traffickers everywhere. Many politicians trade girls like cattle.

    https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/5a2uj7/mega_link_to_fbianon_4chan_ama_transcript_7_amas/

    From his comment on Cattle Traders like you, he doesn’t have to high of an opinion of YOU either.