True Pundit

Politics Security

House Judiciary Member: Mueller Legally Required To Resign Over ‘Conflict Of Interest’

Follow on FacebookFollow on Twitter

Republican Arizona Rep. Trent Franks says that Robert Mueller is in “clear violation” of federal law prohibiting a special counsel from having a conflict of interest and therefore must immediately resign as special counsel overseeing the Russia investigation.

Mueller’s reported friendship with former FBI director James Comey presents a clear conflict of interest, according to Franks, who is a senior member on the House Judiciary Committee. Federal law defines a conflict of interest as: “a personal relationship with any person substantially involved in the conduct that is the subject of the investigation or prosecution.”

“Bob Mueller is in clear violation of federal code and must resign to maintain the integrity of the investigation into alleged Russian ties. Those who worked under them have attested he and Jim Comey possess a close friendship, and they have delivered on-the-record statements effusing praise of one another,” said Franks.

“No one knows Mr. Mueller’s true intentions, but neither can anyone dispute that he now clearly appears to be a partisan arbiter of justice. Accordingly, the law is also explicitly clear: he must step down based on this conflict of interest.”

Special Counsel Robert Mueller leaves the U.S. Capitol Building after meeting with members of the Senate Judiciary Committee in Washington, U.S., June 21, 2017. REUTERS/Aaron P. Bernstein

Mueller was Comey’s predecessor from 2001-2013 and, as reported by Fox News, has a well-documented close relationship with Comey. Other outlets including CNN have documented Comey and Mueller’s long-running history. Comey once called Mueller “one of the finest people I’ve ever met.” An AP report on Comey and Mueller said they “served closely alongside each other in the Bush administration Justice Department” and “have spoken warmly of each other,” although it is disputed that the two are close friends.

Comey testified before the Senate that he orchestrated the leaking of memos he wrote while still FBI director for the express purpose of getting a special counsel appointed after Trump fired him. That special counsel ended up being Robert Mueller.

“Already, this investigation has become suspect – reports have revealed at least four members of Mueller’s team on the Russia probe donated to support Hillary Clinton for President, as President Trump pointed out. These obviously deliberate partisan hirings do not help convey impartiality,” Franks said.

“Until Mueller resigns, he will be in clear violation of the law, a reality that fundamentally undermines his role as Special Counsel and attending ability to execute the law.”

President Trump, who has grown increasingly frustrated with the Russia investigation, has reportedly considered firing Mueller. In a June interview on “Fox and Friends,” Trump said that Mueller was “very, very good friends with Comey, which is bothersome.”

If Trump were to fire Mueller, he could expect certain pushback from both Democrats and Republicans in Congress.

Just last week, Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham said that if Trump fires Mueller, it “could be the beginning of the end of the Trump presidency.”

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected].

Follow on FacebookFollow on Twitter

  • democrat CockRoach

    We need to assign a special prosecutor to check into hillary and his sale of OUR uranium.

  • Dragonfly

    why isn’t he given a budget and deadline. all of us working folk have to work that way – why the no limits for a non existing story? who wouldn’t want to get paid for a job like that? but it doesn’t happen in real life to regular Americans. Crap or get off the pot.

  • Belle


  • Proud deplorable✓ᵀᴿᵁᴹᴾ

    It isn’t just the close relationship that disqualifies him but the very manner in which the investigation started. First of all there was no evidence to even start an investigation, that alone should be reason enough to abolish it but when Comey said he leaked his memos to a friend to get a SP appointed, someone should have spoken up and got an investigation into the SP at that time. He had to leak to get a SP? Why? Because you couldn’t get one following the rule of law? There are just too many (and blatant) violations for this investigation to have any credibility.

  • AZWarrior

    Appoint one special prosecutor every month this investigation lasts to investigate a high ranking Democrat. This crap will stop real quick.