Classified Memo Proves Hillary Supplied Weapons from Benghazi to Al-Qaeda in Syria; DOJ Could Still Indict

Hillary Clinton may have run out the clock on her illicit email scandal and her Uranium One scandal but a possible indictment for transporting arms to terrorists is not going to fade away anytime soon, according to Justice Department sources.

Meanwhile, Julian Assange could have a ‘November Surprise’ brewing for Hillary in the form of more compromising documents like the attached classified DIA cable linking Clinton to knowingly supplying Syria with weapons while she was secretary of state.

Assange is sitting on an arsenal of proof — emails and possible State Department materials — similar to this once-classified Defense Intelligence Agency cable. He hinted that a Hillary-related document dump in October. However, that did not transpire.

Hillary’s involvement and alleged illegal role in the Uranium One scandal is seemingly out of reach of the Justice Department, as the five year criminal statute expired two years ago.

But charges of supplying terrorists with U.S. weapons would transcend the five-year federal criminal statute, according to numerous Justice Department sources.

That means Clinton is still on the hook for those related actions during her tenure as secretary of state. There is no clock to run out, like James Comey did for Hillary’s email scandal and Robert Mueller did for her Uranium One scandal.

Clinton is vulnerable. And Assange could hold key evidence to help indict her just like the juicy DIA cable detailed below.

The DIA Intel provides official confirmation of what has been rumored for years: President Obama, his White House, and Hillary Clinton and her State Department knew that weapons were being shipped from Benghazi to rebel troops in Syria. Those “rebels” were largely al Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood extremist factions, according to corroborating documents.

Below is a gem of an intelligence cable we unearthed from the Defense Intelligence Agency dated September 12, 2012, the day after the Benghazi attack. Absent wholesale redaction, this could prove to be a smoking gun finally exhibiting what the United States was doing in Benghazi prior to the Jihadists attacks on the U.S. consulate and then-secret CIA annex just miles away.

The DIA report, in part, details:

The weapons shipped from Syria during late-August 2012 were Sniper rifles, RPG’s and 125mm and 155mm howitzers missiles.  The numbers for each weapon were estimated to be: 500 Sniper rifles, 100 RPG launchers with 300 total rounds,and approximately 400 howitzers missiles [200 ea – 125mm and 200ea – 155 mm.]

Likewise, this could largely contradict public testimony where officials swore the U.S. had no role in running guns and weapons to Syrian rebels. One such example was in January 2013. Sen. Rand Paul asked Clinton whether the U.S. was involved in the shipping of weapons from Libya to any other country. Paul’s questioning hinged on his belief that weapons from Libya ultimately ended up in the hands of Syrian rebels who later joined with al Qaeda in Iraq to form ISIS. Their exchange is noteworthy now more than ever.

RAND PAUL: It has been in news reports that ships have been leaving from Libya and they might have weapons. What I would like to know, is the annex that was close by [in Benghazi]. Were they involved with procuring, buying, selling, obtaining weapons, and were any of these weapons being transferred to other countries — to any countries, Turkey included.

HILLARY CLINTON: Senator, you’ll have to direct that question to the agency that ran the annex. I will see what information is available.

RAND PAUL: You’re saying you don’t know.

HILLARY CLINTON: I do not now. I don’t have any information on that.

You can watch the Full exchange here:

 

So just who was running these guns and weapons to Syria? The document is heavily redacted (and for obvious reasons) BUT it doesn’t take a genius to figure out the clandestine narrative here. Or perhaps it does. Either way, this confirms that weapons were on the move prior to the Benghazi attack, despite testimony from U.S. officials to the contrary. But it also raises more disturbing scenarios and troubling questions.