True Pundit

Featured Politics Security

CIA: Washington Post Report Linking Russian Government to Trump & Election Hacking Is “Outright Lie”

The Central Intelligence Agency is declaring the Washington Post’s much-hyped story linking the Russian government to hacking the presidential election to help Donald Trump an “outright lie,” according to CIA personnel with direct knowledge of the case.

The Washington Post, in a front-page splash on Friday, fingered the CIA for allegedly confirming the wild rumors of Russian hacking that were concocted and spread by Democratic lawmakers for months preceding the election and the weeks since the GOP win. The Washington Post’s story, however, contained no CIA sources and in fact, no credible U.S. intelligence agency sources whatsoever. Instead, it hinged on what unnamed lawmakers had supposedly been told by unidentified, supposed CIA-linked sources in “secret” briefings: That the CIA had developed proof the Russian state waged an orchestrated campaign to destabilize the U.S. election to benefit GOP-candidate Trump.

“It’s an outright lie,” a CIA analyst divulged to True Pundit. “There’s nothing definitive like that. There are leads from activity originating in Finland, Italy, Norway, Sweden, Britain, France, China and Russia.”

Multiple CIA sources are now denouncing the Washington Post for knowingly reporting misleading national security intelligence. Intelligence insiders said no one in the Agency or in the FBI, who is running at least one parallel inquiry, has ruled out a possible internal leak within the Democratic National Committee from actor(s) inside the United States who funneled private DNC emails to Wikileaks.

On the rabid Sunday morning political talk show circuit yesterday, fueled by the Washington Post’s thinly-sourced yet highly-lauded reporting, Sen. John McCain implored President Elect Trump to look at the CIA-Russian information which he said was credible. McCain, however, as the Senate Armed Services Committee chairman, had strangely never publicly disseminated such intelligence prior to Sunday. And no other elected officials have stepped up to echo his narrative or that of the Washington Post.

CIA and intelligence sources, however, quickly countered McCain’s claims as speculative at best, saying his information is simply not accurate and he, as the Arizona senator has done previously, was grandstanding for the media without knowing key facts.

“If he (McCain) in fact is being told that information, it is bad information,” a CIA source said, pondering whether McCain had perhaps been briefed by outgoing CIA Director John Brennan or his loyal Agency underlings. Multiple sources said Brennan and his inner circle in the Agency could not be trusted to disseminate any true intelligence, especially in their final days on the job, without tainting raw data with political ideologies that parallel their White House boss.

Trump has already named Kansas Congressman Mike Pompeo as Brennan’s successor and CIA personnel anxiously anticipate Brennan’s departure, sources said. (But you won’t read about that in the Washington Post.)

Could the Russian state be linked to hacking to influence the 2016 U.S. election? Intelligence analysts, again, reiterate there is no overwhelming current evidence to definitively link any government to such rogue actions.

CIA personnel said any official information released by Brennan or the White House on this issue prior to President Barack Obama’s departure from office should be discounted and tuned out as partisan “white noise.”

The CIA sources’ collective assessment that the Washington Post purposely and brutally misrepresented the CIA’s findings is the third blow to the embattled newspaper in the last week, having been busted writing two other high profile fake stories on national security that were quickly proven to be problematic and ultimately bogus.

A veteran beltway journalist, author and award-winning professor said very little has changed at the Washington Post since he worked as a Beltway journalist covering politics in Prince George’s, Maryland. Sadly, he said, the Washington Post’s recent practices are not the exception but the rule at the newspaper.

“They just make news up, fabricate whatever news was required at the time, especially when they were scooped or embarrassed by other publications,” said Gregg Morris. “Sometimes they did it because they believed they were entitled. Nothing has changed.”

Morris worked for Time Magazine, the New York Post, Gannett’s Democrat & Chronicle newspaper in Rochester, NY and Washington Star, D.C. A graduate of Cornell University with a bachelor and Master’s degree, Morris is currently an award winning journalism professor at Hunter College in New York City.

Morris has chronicled the decline of the mainstream media, especially the Washington Post, for 30 years as a professor and journalist and is currently working on a new book about corruption in undergraduate higher education.

Morris said the Washington Post’s latest foray into make-believe journalism with the CIA Russian story had several glaring inconsistencies that are often hallmarks of fabricated, fake news, including:

  • Story debates itself. Certain parts of the story directly contradict other so-called facts of the same story. The reader is rendered bewildered; the narrative’s “facts” prove untrustworthy.
  • Haphazard construction. The story’s sloppy foundations and reporting were likely the result of it being constructed on a rush basis or under pressure from editors or the publisher.
  • Weak sourcing. The story fails to nail down a true link between what the Post claims and DIRECT confirmation from CIA sources.

“There are no sources with direct knowledge, it’s just all hearsay,” Morris said. “Who cares what some partisan Senators or lawmakers say they were told. The Post needs real sources on this. Without CIA sources, this story wouldn’t even make it out of my classroom alive.

“The editors should be fired. If you’re covering national security as a reporter for the Post or New York Times, LA Times, and don’t have CIA sources at your fingertips, find another job.”

Morris is far from alone when questioning the Washington Post’s credibility on its concocted narrative of the flimsy CIA-Russian allegations story.

Trump, in an interview with “Fox News Sunday,” dismissed the “revelations” as complete partisan nonsense.

Since Trump’s presidential victory, the Washington Post has trumpeted itself as the left’s self-appointed Fake news Czar but what is has truly uncovered is how the Washington Post itself spreads fakes stories and the outlandish lengths the paper will stretch to defend such problematic pieces of shoddy fiction disguised as objective journalism.

And last week The Washington Post’s malfeasance reached epidemic proportions.

On Monday, The Washington Post began the week attacking General Michael Flynn Sr., Trump’s nominee for National Security Advisor for supporting a True Pundit story in early Nov. which the Post said detailed allegations that Hillary Clinton and her campaign director John Podesta were part of a child trafficking ring in D.C. and beyond dubbed “Pizzagate.”

Sounds quite intriguing except True Pundit never wrote any such story. Flynn on Twitter, had backed a True Pundit story detailing an active FBI investigation into Clinton and her foundation. The Washington Post ignored basic facts and instead anchored its story, again, on fake assertions in an attempt to paint Flynn and True Pundit as “conspiracy” agents disseminating fake news. Simply not true.

More alarming, however, instead of apologizing for smearing General Flynn or True Pundit — or even simply admit its glaring errors — Washington Post personnel tried to cover up the gaffes. Post personnel edited the online story at least eight separate times throughout the day until its contents no longer resembled the original, fabricated edition. The Post then assigned a second story about General Flynn and True Pundit to another reporter to help mask the paper’s first botched story. The Post never mentioned that the original story was altered, edited, or patently incorrect. Also, no reporters ever contacted Flynn or True Pundit prior to publication, a professional tenet which would have saved the newspaper national embarrassment.

By Wednesday, the Washington Post was in the news again but this time with a public apology for publishing a Nov. 24th story on fake news which the newspaper was now publicly admitting was likely based on fake sourcing. That story, titled “Russian propaganda effort helped spread ‘fake news’ during election, experts say,” contained a black list of supposed phony news providers. This week the Washington Post admitted it might have unfairly besmirched and ultimately slandered the named sites by labeling them as Kremlin-backed agents of fake news. The newspaper said its reporter had no way to vet the source, a spooky anonymous website called ProporNot. Strike two.

Let’s recap this not-so-epic week in fabricated Washington Post journalism:

  • Monday: The Post prints a story about fake news attacking General Flynn and True Pundit. That story turned out to be fake.
  • Wednesday: The Post admits its blockbuster Russian propaganda story on fake news, complete with a libelous blacklist, was indeed based on phony, unknown sourcing. That story? Fake too.
  • Friday: The Post ends the work week how it started it: publishing another false story, but upping the stakes by misrepresenting the CIA, another work of fiction now proven false by True Pundit.

If the Washington Post had any pride or professionalism left, a big “if” at this point, reporters and editors would be fired after last week’s brutal display of fake news on parade. However, with Amazon-magnate and billionaire owner Jeff Bezos underwriting the money-bleeding operation at his newspaper — chronic mediocrity, bias and lack of integrity are apparently not shunned, but instead rewarded. Reporters are not lauded for excellence, only for writing to further the political ideology du jour. This is welfare journalism at its best where alleged professionals are paid despite mistakes that not long ago would seriously jeopardize a journalist’s integrity and career.

If a news organization refuses to correct itself when exposed for reporting, spreading, and publicizing chronic falsehoods, how can it hold any moral high ground to denounce fake news?


RELATED: Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) Backs True Pundit CIA Story Exposing Washington Post “Outright Lies”

  • Deplorable Bidnith

    I remember at the end of Bill Clinton’s 2nd term, people on the right raised concerns about him refusing to turn over the reins of power to the next president-elect with no obvious outward appearance that he intended t do so. Then I heard the same fears from the Left at the end of GWB’s second term. Again, I never saw any obvious outward indication that Bush intended to stay beyond his term.

    Now, we have the jug eared clown usurper actually making noises that he may not “be able to” turn over power to the new president-elect because of “Russians”. I hope that behind the scenes somewhere, serious people are telling whomever is behind this crap that out of the 60+ million people that voted for Donald Trump, many of them are not going to accept this and neither will the vast majority of the armed forces and law enforcement officers in this country.

    If they think losing an election is bad, wait until they see what it’s like to stand before a firing squad or the gallows.

  • Andrew Ryan

    “many of them are not going to accept this”

    But currently the same people are telling everyone to ‘suck it up and accept the results’ and we’re hearing that the right never riots, only the left. So I’m sure if turns out that something shady is happened and for whatever reason Trump doesn’t become POTUS, the right will indeed ‘suck it up’ and not riot about it, right?

  • RBJ

    Personally, I hope what you say here is true; however, I have a couple of issues with this article: 1) True Pundit did post a bogus article on Nov 2 talking about Anthony Weiner’s laptop saying that there was evidence on the computer that proved that Hillary was involved in a pedophilia and child exploitation ring. Gen Flynn later twitted a link to the article. While the article was not about child TRAFFICKING it was still a bogus, outrageous article that some could argue qualifies as conspiracy theory. 2 days later, TP posted another article saying that Comey and the FBI were preparing to make raids/arrests at the Clinton Foundation. Which also turned out to be completely bogus. 2) You label a website in this article as “a spooky anonymous website.” Couldn’t the same thing be said about True Pundit since each article is anonymous and we have no idea who is doing the reporting here? Just a couple of observations. Having said this I still am reading your work. And like I say, keep hoping that what you write is true. Does that make me a conspiracy theorist?

  • jubadoobai

    This is a good piece of work. The point of the Russia hacking story is to provide a basis for electors to give the presidency to Hillary, taint the jury pool should she be indicted, label the WikiLeaks documents as fraudulent, serve as a pretext for martial law when Obama refuses to leave, and maintain Democrat power.

  • True Pundit

    Weiner story involves ongoing FBI probe. Major tenets of the story have already been proven correct. Others, only time will tell. Complicated, complex issues don’t get sewn up in an hour like TV dramas and often the Intel is fluid and messy and the wheels of justice are surely slow and in this era, unpredictably biased. On Comey, we report what agents tell us and we have been spot on with FBI sources and intel. If Comey decides to change his mind on a dime, for whatever reasons — and he has done that how many times now? — no way to counter that. Pound for pound, our history proves, we break more dependable and important news than anyone else on the web and we are just getting started. Merry Christmas, my friend.

  • ScorpioMommy68

    You’re comparing apples and oranges. When the election occurred both 4 & 8 years ago, everyone who was not happy was told to “suck it up”, WHILE WATCHING everyone laugh, taunt and then seeing the country descend. There were no riots or BS caused by the right side of the aisle. People moved forward. Now, can you say the same has occurred? No, a bunch of upset people decided to RIOT and cause CIVIL UNREST because they are “not happy” with the election results. Seriously SUCK IT UP and do the right thing; wait for another 4 years or see what happens. You ALL LOOK like a bunch of FOOLS. One more thing, “RIOTING” and “defending our constitutional rights” are two entirely different things.

  • Joseph Powell

    So this would be ‘fake news’…got it.

  • Patriot76

    WaPo has turned into the National Enquirer. What a joke that once great paper has turned into under Bezos.

  • Kim Bruce

    Fake News! Now we can clearly see why Mark Levin refers to the rag as “The Washington Compost”.

  • Dexter Morgan

    Has anybody fact check Truepundint ? appears like a prime example of either fake and misleading propaganda site. Then again the gullible enjoy this misinformation because it solidifies their narrow minded view of the world

  • BruceMichaelGrant

    Propaganda 101.
    Print the lie as front page headlines.
    Print the correction or retraction in the classified section.
    This is at least the third phony story WaPo has had to retract in the last week.

  • whats_up

    So by your own admission parts of your story might not be correct. Ya great reporting there.

  • Raven Smith

    People moved forward… what a joke. Eight years of butt hurt from the right and you’re still complaining. The Obamas were called apes, monkey, gorillas, etc. and didn’t say a word. Melania feels insulted and sues. Most of the right still believes Obama is a Muslim because of Trump. Maybe you are the one who needs to suck it up. Come back in 8 yrs. then tell us what we can or cannot do.

  • BruceMichaelGrant

    His logic makes sense. Nothing in the WaPo story makes any direct connection to the CIA.
    It’s anonymous hearsay twice removed from anonymous ‘officials’ relaying ambiguous ‘intelligence’ which they were allegedly ‘given’ by anonymous intelligence sources in ‘secret briefings’.
    TruePundit claims actual CIA sources told him directly that this story was an outright lie.

    Now you can believe what you want to believe but in the contest of sources I’d say TruePundit was more credible on principle.

  • BruceMichaelGrant

    That’s a big change in your previous insinuation that TP was printing ‘bogus’ stories.
    Way to change the goalposts, pal.

  • rwilliams

    Hey, it wasn’t Trump supporters who fell for the Democrat conspiracy, per Bill Ivey’s email to John Podesta: ” . . .And as I’ve mentioned, we’ve all been quite content to demean government, drop civics and in general conspire to produce an unaware and compliant citizenry. The unawareness remains strong. . . .” If you want to see “gullible” look in the mirror.

  • Stacey’s Mom

    Did he change his screen name but forgot the avatar?

  • Andrew Ryan

    “WHILE WATCHING everyone laugh, taunt ”

    Who was laughing and taunting? Obama supporters were just glad he won. It’s only the Trump supporters now who seem obsessed with lording it over non-Trump supporters. They seem desperate to convince themselves that this validates them in some way, to be seen as winners. Trump won here, not his supporters, many of whom are already starting to realise that with his array of appointments draw from Goldman Sachs insiders and friends of Putin, he’s filling the swamp deeper rather than draining it.

  • MrSnuggles2k2

    you are a fool if you expect the winning side in an election to ‘suck it up’ after a coup. and that is what it would be, a coup.

    you are advocating for treason and the overthrow of a duly elected president

  • ScorpioMommy68

    Yes, Obama supporters were HORRIBLE. I’m related to two who realized they’d been had within the first year of his presidency. You quickly say you were happy he won but, Trump supporters aren’t supposed to be happy? You keep on eating up that Russian narrative; they’re counting on you guys!

  • ScorpioMommy68

    When everyone I know is worse off after 8 years under a President, SOMETHING IS WRONG. I don’t care what anyone says, IT IS WRONG. If you’re better off, you’re a snowflake or someone receiving EXTREME BENEFIT. My democrat relatives are at least honest enough to admit they made an error in judgment.

    Not dealing with or engaging snowflakes. You have no idea how to really deal with things. You’re socially and emotionally inept.

  • ScorpioMommy68

    Check into the record of True Pundit. If they’ve had to print retractions, corrections, etc., you’ll be able to find them!

  • MrSnuggles2k2

    because the wapoo is so reliable. they already had to admit “propornot” is a fake website! at some point they will admit their cia source is fake too

  • MrSnuggles2k2

    remember obama said “i won”, he said “you can come along for the ride, but you have to sit in the back of the bus”.

    remember skeletor aka james carville gloating that we would never see another republican president ever again in our history. you must be a child still if you cant remember the gloating when obama won.

  • MrSnuggles2k2

    obama received the same insults bush did. mcchimpybushhitler or did you forget that one?

    the accusations aimed at trump are far more serious. you democrats are beating the war drums with russia, if you fools arent careful you will start WW3

  • ScorpioMommy68

    They are completely clueless and hypocritical to the extreme.

  • ScorpioMommy68

    One other thing, try to discern between “butt hurt” like you guys are ALL acting NOW versus people who were and still are being HARMED by this current administration. That’s why SHE LOST! In order to prevent more of the same disastrous BS, it was imperative that people show up in certain states and they DID; the EC explains it extremely easily.

  • ScorpioMommy68

    Yes, they ARE and they are so morally bankrupt, they don’t see it or don’t give a flying fig!

  • whats_up

    Since this is my first post on True Pundit, you would be wrong.

  • BruceMichaelGrant

    Busted. Sorry.

  • ScorpioMommy68

    Oh yeah, anyone into MSNBC? Joe Scarborough: “Hillary Clinton Cost Hillary Clinton the Election”. Also, MSNBC bigwigs received a call because Mika was criticizing too much. Look into it, IF YOU CAN HANDLE THE TRUTH.

  • bailintheboat

    More WashPost and Hillary fake news being exposed on a regular basis.

  • AmericanVeteran1

    And you Raven are a pig faced dog.

  • Dexter Morgan

    You do realize Congress is privy to classified information that the media and general public are not?

  • The Darker Side

    I think you’re confusing honesty in journalism with perfection. True Pundit spells it out very clearly above in a way that most folks can understand. They are running about 85-90% correct on everything. What other news source has that track record?

    So you are concerned about the 10-15% while ignoring the 85–90%? Makes you sound ridiculous.

  • Buddy_Rogers

    The unnamed “intelligence source” is beginning to sound like the same sources who disclosed Benghazi was cause by a “private video”.

  • ScorpioMommy68

    Why did the DHS try to hack the state of GA during the election?

  • BruceMichaelGrant

    If it was really ‘classified’ then why was it allegedly leaked?
    Those alleged ‘sources’ are then either guilty of unlawfully disclosing classified information (i.e. espionage) or the whole story is false.
    Which is it?

  • whats_up

    No Avatar, yes you are that stupid.

  • Buddy_Rogers

    BJ Clinton holds the record for not getting the hell off of the stage and out of the limelight after the ceremony to inaugurate his successor and looking the other way while his lowlifes vandalized government property in the same White House he allowed his Crooked old lady to loot.

    BTW, THINKING people can deduce for themselves that the Russian hack is folderol.

  • whats_up

    Prove they are running 85-90% correct on everything. Dare ya.

  • The Darker Side

    You’ve been here a whole hour? Maybe keep your yap shut newbie and defer to those who’ve been reading this site regularly.

  • Buddy_Rogers

    I remember a black couple I know referring to the once and always community organizer in first year or so as the new “HNIC”. Then telling me what the acronym meant.

  • ScorpioMommy68

    New blog post. craigmurray dot org. Addressed TODAY. He KNOWS the actual “sources”. Insider leak.

  • whats_up

    So you have no proof. Typical of Trumpkins.

  • zbacku

    It’s all FAKE. The MSM is nothing but the SS Arm of the Democrat Party.

  • porchhound

    Maybe Trump can have a little chat with Bezos during the tech guru meeting!

  • Dannz

    Good article, explains well one member of the MSM swamp.

  • Dannz


  • Dave Garry

    When the CIA – a group of admitted liars and domestic propagandists – come out with a report, you can bet it’s fake news.

    The CIA was wrong in their assessment of the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
    The CIA has been proven time after time to be wrong in their assessment of situations around the world.
    The CIA has been directly responsible for the overthrow, or the attempted overthrow of democratically elected governments world wide.
    The CIA intent right now is the overthrow of of the government of Syria which is a democratically elected government with a very high approval rating of the Syrian people.
    The CIA was involved in, if not the actual instigator of the assassination of JFK.
    The CIA has been caught smuggling drugs.

    So why should Trump, or anyone, believe or trust what the CIA tells them?

  • libby

    The sheer audacity of the MSM to complain about “Fake News” is incredibly brazen considering how much propaganda they’ve spewed out at America over the last 30+ years. It’s also deceptive framing as they try conflate the fringes of alternate media with Wikileaks and the more respectable alternate media outlets. In Wikileaks case, it really has been an effort to undermine one of a very few sources actually willing to back up it’s claims, entirely, without misleading narrative with hard evidence throughout the election. – Primary source evidence demonstrating how crooked the DNC were and how the Clintons were a corrupting influence in the state department.

    We are told Russia unduly influenced the election – We are NOT told that this allegation is on the basis of an act that actually EXPOSED Hillary’s DNC insiders plotting to sabotage the Sanders campaign to throw the primary and exposed campaign affiliates colluding with the MSM.

    Those unduly influencing the election WERE the DNC establishment and their co-conspirators in the MSM. Whoever did the hacking, Russia or otherwise, did little more than tell the truth.

  • Dannz

    ‘The SS Arm of the Democrat Party’, Nice one.

  • Dannz

    Can’t find gullible in the dictionary, check it out.

  • jim marcum

    Andrew Ryan you shit breath. There is a major difference in accepting an election or accepting a coup de tat. some tyrannical government try’s to toss an election to the side that was won and won easily is going to answer to the people. We, the people, will quickly hang the bastards and hang them high for the world to see. I think you better watch a replay of the Army / Navy football game and see where the heart of the military is. Don’t try fucking with our free government and the election process or we will come and get you. By the way, we still have our guns, Obama couldn’t get them and Clinton will never get the chance.

  • jim marcum

    Obama has defended Islam time and again. Obama often lectures to the American people how Islam feels and what they believe. How do you do that if you are not one of them. I will bet you 50 dollars to 500 that Obama is Muslim.

  • dukesdesire119

    Get a grip, who’s he suppose to hire? People with no experience? His appointees are people who know how to make informed important decisions that benefit who they work for, which becomes a proven fact based on your statement. The appointees will now work for us we the people, not their past employers. They know how to get the job done without interference and intimidation from people like you who want to discredit them and their ability to perform their JOB! Their boss is now DJT who represents America, it’s people and our best interest. This is what happens when snowflakes and the left try to find ways to discredit anything that doesn’t align with their leftist, commie views. America will prosper by the people who are the best and the brightest and have the knowledge to cut through all the bullshit and get what’s in the best interest of the person they are doing the job for. Not Goldman Sachs, Putin or any other person other than us We the People, with DJT leading this Drain the Swamp charge to MAGA!

  • dogitydog

    That’s weird, I didn’t see the Washington Post on the list of Fake News sources. It must be some kind of mistake. I’m sure the MSM will correct it right away. Oh wait, the Washington Post is the MSM. Huh, I’m confused. Could it be that the news sources of the MSM that are pointing the finger and calling other news sources Fake News are actually the Fake News themselves? (sarc)

  • Ann Marie

    The Washington Post has to be boycotted and fast, they are the worst of fake news and they don’t care !

  • Ann Marie

    This will give the right the perfect reason to start rioting !!

  • Ann Marie

    Didn’t say a word? You must be living in a cave !

  • Z-Boy

    If ‘jugears’ tries it the army will arrest him.

  • ScorpioMommy68

    Nice. Wikileaks email dtd 4/27/2016 within the DNC – “We don’t have a ton on Simes, but the pro-Russia stuff ties in pretty well to idea that Trump is too friendly with Putin/weak with Russia.” The “Russians Did It” narrative was cooked up almost 8 full months ago. How pathetic that people keep swallowing all of the government’s censored drivel.

  • AFatalPapercut

    So you have nothing but insults?

    Typical of a load that should’ve been swallowed.

  • Dick Ellis


  • AFatalPapercut

    You do realize CIA has no jurisdiction on cybercrime and cyber intrusions?

    I cannot stress this enough to you Dexter.

    The FBI and NCIJTF handle any and ALL cyber crime/intrusions into the US.
    The NCIJTF investigated the NK SONY hack.

    The CIA quite literally, shouldn’t have made a statement, they are merely a liaison to NCIJTF in cyber security matters.


  • Z-Boy

    If you see a story having anything to do with the “Washington Post” simply ignore it. Don’t waste a minute reading it.

  • Z-Boy

    It’s very plain that Senator John McCain is in bed with the DNC. What McCain has done is probably a felony.

  • Scagsdale

    Not going to work. Hillary, if not pardoned by Obama, will end up severing time in prison along with her hubby, daughter, and a multitude of others for the Clinton Foundation Money Laundering and Influence Peddling operation, which is still under FBI investigation in several offices.

  • whats_up

    So again no proof. Gotcha.

  • Rascal

    Give me a break Andrew. Twitter existed 4 years ago. “Who was laughing and tauting” – lol.

  • Rascal

    I agree with Andrew on Goldman Sachs. Who cares about experience when the experience is running the US into the ground. Same with Bolton btw. Everything else he says is laughable though.

  • Rascal

    I think you should prove the right wrong by crying about it more. LOLOLOLOL. You lost.

  • BruceMichaelGrant

    Sorry pal. I saw that avatar BEFORE you deleted it.
    So did another poster.
    Now I KNOW you’re the same guy.
    Busted, pal.

  • BruceMichaelGrant

    Yes you have an avatar.
    It’s still up.
    And it’s the SAME ONE as ‘RBJ’.
    Just because you deleted it from your home page doesn’t retroactively delete it from your past posts.

  • BruceMichaelGrant

    Yeah. Right.
    In the classifieds.
    Of the Sunday edition.

  • mj23424

    Can you tell me the others? Just wondering since I’d like to use them.

  • mj23424

    People need to understand what’s happening here. The politicians are all afraid Trump is going to go after them. They are all extremely dirty people who are committing treason on a daily basis. That’s why they are fighting him. They are criminal sellouts.

  • Frank Bouchard

    so true!

  • BruceMichaelGrant

    Look in the story.

    The WaPo’s allegation that Gen Flynn was pushing ‘Pizzagate’ as a legitimate story reported by TruePundit without verifying the story with either party. WaPo later ‘edited’ the story out of all resemblance to their original phony claim.

    Then we have the ‘PropOrNot’ fiasco where the Washington Post printed another phony story from a left-wing group that included the Drudge Report, among 200 other news outlets, as ‘agents’ of Russian disinformation.

    Both left- and right-leaning groups on this blacklist threatened legal action against the Washington Post and their editors were forced to ‘distance’ themselves from this also ‘anonymous’ group which produced no evidence or clues to its methodology.

    The Washington Post printed three stories, including this ‘Russian hacking’ farce, with a complete disregard approaching contempt for even the most basic journalistic ethics.

    It’s no surprise at all that they’ve had to run for cover all week.

  • SteveO

    If it comes to a coup I expect Hillary’s Secret Service detail will arrest her themselves.

  • SteveO

    yep…less of a riot…and more like a military campaign.

  • ScorpioMommy68

    No, you’re talking about Soros paying the rioters. Defending constitutional rights is totally different AND legal.

  • SteveO

    No, I am not. I am saying that the conservative response to an attempted coup will not be riots…It will be more like an army of patriots driving on washington.

  • Cheryl ✓ᵀᴿᵁᴹᴾ

    I think you might be right!

  • RDaneel
  • SkippingDog

    Nice bit of Russian propaganda here. Did it originate in RT?

  • Robbins Mitchell

    That whole bunch needs to be butt phuqued with a chainsaw

  • Keepdad

    Why work hard for an accurate new story when you can just make it up? The lame stream media is just flogging this dead horse because of Democrat calls for “Russian intervention” in the election process. This started, if I recall correctly, before the election with Hillary’s team.

  • MJC

    Thank God for the whistleblower(s), legal or not, who so clearly exposed the treachery of the hag, her huma, her DNC hypocrites, her horny hubby, and her uniparty hacks.

    Trump/Pence 2016-2024

  • ScorpioMommy68

    LOL! Sorry, you’re not on the correct forum for that.

  • ScorpioMommy68

    Sorry for the misunderstanding. I swear I should stay off when I’m ill. Again, sorry.

  • MyWikiDisQus

    As a common person, I try and look at things objectively most of the time. I’ve come to the conclusion that several entities involved with making decisions that affect my life are not doing it for my benefit but their own. I find lists helpful in solving problems so I made two of them; the first is fifteen groups:

    1. The politicos in the federal and State government and their bureaucracies
    2, The “Political Party of One” (a.k.a., republicans and democrats)
    3. The national news media (television and print)
    4. So called subject matter experts on economic and foreign policy
    5. Political partisan pundits
    6. The entire war department (oops, I meant “defense” department)
    7. The national intelligence agencies
    8. Wall Street including the commercial banks
    9. The entertainment industry (film, music, live performances)
    10. Social networks of shared interests including family and friends
    11. The education pedagogues
    12. The healthcare Cosa Nostra
    13. Self-anointed stewards of planet Earth
    14. The transportation industry
    15. The progenitors of spiritual deities

    There may be more but this is a good start. Okay, what do they want from me? A second list follows:

    1. My acceptance that I need them to live and be happy.
    2. My consent to allow them to exercise control over me.
    3. My wealth.

    I can look at this exercise two ways, (1) I’m small in relation to the first list, (2) I actually control the first list.
    I like number (2) because it empowers me with a sense of control. Number (1) makes me feel weak and insignificant. I think I’ll stick with option (2) as much as possible because I like the sensation, it clearly is
    good for me. Yes, I’m going with number (2) as much as possible from now on.

  • justwannaliveright

    Hope True Pundit always gets front and center sittings during WH press conferences, while wapo gets excluded EVERY TIME!

  • james smith

    she lost because she lied to congress, she failed to fulfill the duties of her post as sec. of state, and she allowed state secrets to fall into the hands of unknown agencies. she is inept and morally corrupt. that is why she did not win this election. i myself am praying for this great country to become united again. and president trump is the best chance we have right now. as far as the media goes, just more of the left whining and making things up, relax trumpsters, the hag cant steal this one.

  • SteveO

    No problem at all. I’ve done it before myself…probably too many times 🙂

  • PlainBill

    Just remember if it does happen that Obama issues a pardon for Hillary, by blackletter law a pardon presumes the party is guilty of the crime pardoned.
    IF Hillary gets a pardon, then I suggest she forever be referred to as Hillary Clinton, unpunished felon.

  • mikebartnz

    +Buddy Bill and Hillary just needed a little more time to plunder the White House.

  • Karlie Schaefer

    You realize that NONE of your sources are named either & the CIA is not saying this report is an outright lie.

    Take your own advice “If a news organization refuses to correct itself when exposed for reporting, spreading, and publicizing chronic falsehoods, how can it hold any moral high ground to denounce fake news?”

  • “Undocumented Felon” is more in keeping with tradition 😉


    Muster at Tysons Corner and ready to fight

  • Charles Kafka

    right from the president’s office pure bullshit. .errr i mean propaganda..

  • John

    The clown circus gets more and more retarded as each day passes, all is needed is about 100,000 patriots to mass at DC at the swearing in to make sure things are done right according to the law.

  • East Clintwood

    Anyone actually listen to hannoi john mcsongbird or lindsey ‘pushes s t without a wheelbarrow’ graham?

  • Scrub DeplorableScrub

    I’m using that! It needs to go viral, falling from the lips of every Patriot & shouted from the rooftops until it rings in the streets like church bells on Sunday morning!

  • whats_up

    Wrong ace. But remain stupid, its par for the course with you.

  • ScorpioMommy68

    Yeah, only the CIA doesn’t have jurisdiction (and doesn’t bother with hacking) and actually did nothing except issue an cover up. You need to recheck as you’re sadly, extremely uninformed. If you’re concerned with the accuracy and legitimacy of True Pundit, google their record; you’ll have no problem finding their retractions, apologies,etc., if there are any.

  • ScorpioMommy68

    Thank you for being so gracious 🙂

  • ScorpioMommy68

    DING DING DING! Annnnndddddd we have a winnerrrrrrrrrrr! I LOVE this one!

  • ScorpioMommy68

    If you had read the comments, you’d have seen this FACT. “You do realize CIA has no jurisdiction on cybercrime and cyber intrusions?
    I cannot stress this enough to you Dexter. The FBI and NCIJTF handle any and ALL cyber crime/intrusions into the US.
    The NCIJTF investigated the NK SONY hack.

    The CIA quite literally, shouldn’t have made a statement, they are merely a liaison to NCIJTF in cyber security matters.”


  • Karlie Schaefer

    You genuinely think that one of the CIA analysts is secretly going against the public statement the CIA made?… and that this CIA analyst decided to talk to TruePundit about it? The TruePundit facebook page has 1,000 followers,…If they wanted to get the news out, theyd have spoken to a more established news source with a much larger reader base….

  • Karlie Schaefer

    If you were following the news at all besides on True Pundit, youd know that the CIA’s briefing was confirmed by 16 additional US intellligence agencies including the NSA, the FBI and the NCIJTF. The Dept of Homeland Security also confirmed the hacking occurred.


  • Deplorable Clare

    Obama also proclaimed “elections have consequences”. In other words, those that opposed him were to “suck it up.”

  • Deplorable Clare

    Two of the most-used insults the left threw at Bush were “chimp” and “shrub”.

    Btw Raven, Melania is a mother. She threatened a lawsuit out of protection for their son. It had nothing to do with her “feeling insulted”. What mother, in the public eye, WOULDN’T protect their child from slander? Obviously you’re not a mother.

  • Deplorable Clare

    Wrong. I believed Obama to be a muslim before he was elected, when I did my homework on him. I researched and found out about his associations with the Muslim Brotherhood. Trump had nothing to do with it. Stop making sweeping generalizations about things when you have no evidence to back it up.

  • Deplorable Clare

    He also has a deep-seated contempt for Christians. That’s another clue.

  • Deplorable Clare

    Yep. They are a tabloid. So is the NYTimes.

  • AnotherLover

    Ha ha. TruePundit’s crushing it. Remember, though — you’ve strayed into the trap already. The BIG NEWS from this election cycle is the mainstream media’s complete self-destruction. They filled our heads with fake news for months. Hold them accountable to this election cycle — and everything else they print too, of course! But don’t let this election cycle fade. The media’s sitting on that big, flat, frictionless surface — they have no traction and can’t move and are mightily blowing hot, filth-speckled air in one direction to gain traction and get moving again. The media’s clearly fighting for their lives but they’ve gotten FAR too complacent with their continuous creation of fake news. They’ve lost the touch, lost the nuances, and have come to believe they can spew whatever garbage they see fit to make up. They’ve been lying so long they don’t know what a lie looks like anymore. They don’t know what discerns a lie from the truth! They’ve fallen prey to their own cognitive dissonance and are utterly confused and helpless fawns chewing their way through an alien landscape. Let them implode. Let them completely self-destruct. They’re over there chewing on poison oak right now. Let them eat it. They deserve it.

  • BruceMichaelGrant

    Another lie. Typical. But you libs can’t help it.

    If your ass was on fire you’d give the fire department a phony address.

  • Deplorable Clare

    Name the “16 additional US intelligence agencies”, please. We keep hearing this but no one has identified the 16. If you cannot, you are just spewing fake news information.

  • AnotherLover

    Ha ha ha. Butthurt much? Trump supporters endured MONTHS of abuse from all corners of the lamestream, lyin’ press and Hillary’s pathetic, mind-washed zombies. So many cocky Hillary supporters covered these comments sections with their obnoxious taunts. Now they get to EAT IT. They all get to EAT IT. Now you blame Trump supporters for being mean? Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Gtfo with that! And what’s this? “Friends of Putin?” Watch out or I’ll report you to the FBI! Lmao! Go read some more Washington Post, man. They’ll lie to ya just like ya like it.

  • whats_up

    Stupid is as stupid does.

  • stevor

    well, duh, the WaPo is the CIA/commie rag and it seems that they’re making their move to destroy the US for o’bama (o’bama said he wanted to “fundamentally change” (destroy) the US).
    The stock market is real high, ready to crash.
    The Federal Reserve is about to raise the interest rate, to make it so the US can’t pay the interest on the National Debt any more.

    Yeah, hold on to your hat (and maybe sell your stocks, using the money for “metal”) as a hedge against it all.

  • Karlie Schaefer

    The IC is headed by the The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), and made up of 16 members: Twenty-Fifth Air Force, Intelligence and Security Command, Central Intelligence Agency, Coast Guard Intelligence, Defense Intelligence Agency, Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, Office of Intelligence and Analysis, Bureau of Intelligence and Research, Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence, Office of National Security Intelligence, Federal Bureau of Investigation Intelligence Branch, Marine Corps Intelligence Activity, National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, National Reconnaissance Office, Central Security Service/National Security Agency & Office of Naval Intelligence.

  • I’ve been saying this for days. Why would the CIA pick up the phone and call some newspaper reporter?? Does this make sense to anyone? I’ve been saying this was a lie from the get-go.

  • ScorpioMommy68

    What I think is that people swallow what the MSM and gov’t tell them to. You’re not willing to be an individual and that’s your right. Don’t tell others that they’re wrong when you won’t even bother to fact check. The CIA is LYING through their teeth but, you keep on following, you’re what they want.

  • Are you saying it’s fake news ?

  • Karlie Schaefer

    And what makes you think they are lying? What reason do they have to lie? Why would all 16 agencies come to the same false conclusion? Then why would they share the info with the House and Senate (both majority Republican). And if the evidence wasnt credible
    enough, why would the Senate be seeking a bipartisan congressional investigation? Republican senators Lindsay Graham.& chairman McCain & repub senate majority leader McConnel all want an investigation. Regardless
    of your party or who you voted for, Russia hacking us is a huge deal & we can’t let this happen again in the future.

    You are the one you going along blindly with whatever Trump says. You re like a cheerleader for him. whatever he does, win or lose, u just cheer. There is nothing but 70 year old Trump to back up his claim we werent hacked vs 16 US intelligence agencies, the dept of Homeland security, the president. senators from both parties & more.

  • ScorpioMommy68

    You refuse to look at anything outside the box. I don’t give a flying fig what you point out. What 16 agencies? Names? Look into it if you have the intestinal fortitude, which I SERIOUSLY DOUBT.

    This has nothing to do with being a cheerleader. I’ve been able to observe my government via uncensored sources. You’re an horrendous fool and aren’t even worth my time but, I gave you a chance.

    Keep your head buried, you make an excellent ostrich. YOU’VE BEEN HAD! #NWFE

  • Karlie Schaefer

    Uncensored “news” that can’t give a name of their source or get anyone to back up their claims. The first few paragraphs of this article contain a lot of incorrect information. The FBI has confirmed Russian hacking, they confirmed this back in October if you recall. FBI has just not confirmed the exact motive behind the attack at this time.

  • ScorpioMommy68

    You’re so full of garbage! Quit regurgitating what YOU’VE BEEN TOLD TO BELIEVE. You have NOTHING. Read something other than what they place in front of you. No, the FBI lied and it’s still hilarious that you can’t see that the left is actively trying to STEAL an election. If you can’t be honest, you’ve got serious integrity issues. Look at ALL sides, NOT just your chosen one. Once you do, you’ll feel enlightened. Once you face life and desire ALL facts in order to make an informed decision, perhaps you’ll evolve. #NWFE

  • ScorpioMommy68

    I said I watch via uncensored sources. Don’t try semantics with me or try to put words in my mouth. You need to grow up and figure things out. If you look, you too, can find uncensored sources. Living outside the U.S. has assisted greatly. That you continue to cite the FBI, “Russia did it” and most likely, snopes, is very telling of someone who refuses to seek truth and only wants to be told they’re hearing the truth and spouts BS. If you truly want info, I can give you info. If you want attention and engagement, I’m not the person for you to bother.

  • ctlovesnathanhale

    Bezos is one of the biggest fraudulent, front man, kleptocrat wannabes on the planet — total fake, collectivist/totalitarian bankster minion POS. Bezos was given Wapo so he would have their files of dirt on all the congress critters, the better to push the internet sales tax which will initially shut down a big chuck of the American economy by killing off Amazon’s competition, then turn over those millions of jobs and all the profits to the Chinese. Bezos’ Amazon is nothing more than a wrecking ball designed by the banksters to turn over the American economy to the Chinese.

  • Bubble Buster

    Where are all 16 intelligence agencies reports that provides REAL TANGIBLE evidence that the Russians hacked into DNC Computers in which the Russians supposedly provided Wikileaks with the their emails ( Assange has denied any Russian involvement in Wikileaks/Podesta emails) and interfered with the 2016 election? Where the proof? Where’s the BEEF? What are they basing this on? Secret reports by anonymous intelligence agents/analysts?

    If there was ANY REAL evidence don’t you think that it would have been disclosed by now? John MCCain and Lindsey Graham were never Trump supporters, if you review the record, these BSer’s are trying to raise on a busted flush after the recounts in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania did not turn out the way the anti-Trump cry babies hoped for. Jill Stein’s reason for wanting a recount was because she thought there was possible Russian hacking/interference going on. That recount did not turn up any Russian or any one else’s interference btw.

    The Obama administration said it has seen no evidence of hackers tampering with the 2016 presidential election, even as recount proceedings began in Wisconsin.

    “We stand behind our election results, which accurately reflect the will of the American people,” a senior administration official told POLITICO late Friday.

    “The federal government did not observe any increased level of malicious cyber activity aimed at disrupting our electoral process on election day,” the official added. “We believe our elections were free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective.”

    Are all 16 intelligence agencies keeping the White House and Obama in the dark? Or is this a carefully crafted CANARD?

  • Karlie Schaefer

    You can keep putting things in all caps but that doesnt make it true. I clearly am not only reading what they “place in front of me” if I read and commented on this article…


  • ScorpioMommy68

    LOL Good luck sucker! You’re gonna need it!

  • Karlie Schaefer

    Lol, youre the only trusting Russia, a man who has never given you reason to trust him, and a bogus article… i think you’re gunna need the luck more than me but thanks, i never turn away good luck wishes 🙂

  • Bubble Buster

    Not a fact!

    The “Fact” That 17 Intelligence Agencies Confirmed Russia is Behind the Email Hacks Isn’t Actually…A “Fact”

    “Glenn Greenwald exhaustively back-traced where the ‘Russia-hacked-the-election’ meme came from and that it was pure spin. The original author who set the entire farce in motion later admitted it was all a mistake, and in his own ‘Mea Culpa’ revealed that according to the subtext of extensive emails from a Newsweek reporter pressuring him to allow the lie to live, it was US intelligence agencies pushing to spread this narrative.”

    Glenn Greenwald
    In the Democratic Echo Chamber, Inconvenient Truths Are Recast as Putin Plots

    Newsweek Journalist Claims US Intelligence Fed Him False Putin-Trump Conspiracy

  • Karlie Schaefer

    lmao, what are you talking about? its not from a meme, its an intelligence report…turn on a tv, geez

    or here, read:

  • ScorpioMommy68

    Another organization’s take: http://dissidentvoice dot .org/2016/12/the-medias-emphasis-on-russian-hacking-is-a-diversion/

  • porchhound

    Excellent points!!

  • Andrew Ryan

    Sure, he should hire Goldman Sachs employees and friends of Putin – that’s the way to drain the swamp. Get a grip yourself.

  • Andrew Ryan

    Jim marcum – you twat weasel. You toss puffin. Is that your level of debate? Hang your head in shame, you traitorous, Putin-loving quisling.

  • Andrew Ryan

    Sure, you keep saying the CIA is talking nonsense. Everything is fine, go back to sleep America.

  • Andrew Ryan

    “you are advocating for treason”

    Nope, look elsewhere for the treason, and look harder.

  • Andrew Ryan

    People moved forward? Eight years of birtherism and claiming Obama wasn’t a real American? THAT’s butthurt. Nope, try again.

  • MrSnuggles2k2

    Overthrowing a duly and fairly elected president through illegal means is by definition treason. You are guilty of incitement and i hope you get a visit from the secret service

  • tommy tunes

    If I were TRUMP I would tell Bezos that the American People elected me to CUT the WASTE like YOUR 600 million dollar contract with the CIA to conduct Fake Propaganda News !!!!!

  • Sounds like somebody is in dire need of a “Safe Place.” lol

  • ScorpioMommy68

    Thank heaven they woke up before certain disaster! That’s why the election went the way it did. The CIA IS talking nonsense. It’s OK, they bank on people like you and others who swallow whatever they tell you to. The “Russian Narrative” was discussed in an April 27, 2016 email and yes, anyone can verify this. The CIA doesn’t deal with cyber crime (yes, you can verify this, too), why is that so hard for you to understand? The list 16 agencies yet, nobody can name or will name. You’ve been lied to for your entire life, I’m sorry to say and you are the one who needs to wake up or shut up. #NWFE

  • Steve R

    What exactly is it that the Russians are accused of doing?

  • ScorpioMommy68

    Now, Andrew. What do you have to say after taking the time to read this article? http://truepundit dot com/office-of-the-director-of-national-intelligence-odni-backs-true-pundit-cia-story-exposing-washington-post-outright-lies/

  • ScorpioMommy68

    You are so immature, you can’t discern between “butt hurt” and terrified of a TYRANT! When you figure out you’ve been lied to by O, the entire time, how are you going to react? Will you feel betrayed? Every single idiot that I know who cast their vote for him, didn’t make the same mistake the second time AND they’re all WORSE OFF. That should make anyone take pause but, like the rest of your ilk, you’re OK because you weren’t personally affected by any of his disastrous policies. That makes you a huge part of the problem.

  • ScorpioMommy68

    The CIA IS talking nonsense. Here, for your convenience: http://truepundit dot com/office-of-the-director-of-national-intelligence-odni-backs-true-pundit-cia-story-exposing-washington-post-outright-lies/

  • ”Hair” Drumpf Goes to Washington!
    The world’s greatest confidence man has been elected to the moderator’s chair of the ultimate reality show; and, as he has previously demonstrated on his TV show, he could not give a hoot about the show’s contestants.

    Drumpf’s sole reason for being is to feed his insatiable narcissism, and underpin his—always exaggerated and, hopefully, now declining—wealth. Anyone that thinks that Drumpf’s intention is to benefit anyone other than himself is delusional; or, if you think that a man who has spent his entire adult life ostentatiously promoting himself—invariably at the cost of others—now cares one iota about you or anyone else—dream on!

    The reality is, Drumpf will—for a fee—lend his name to, and spruik on behalf of, any scheme, regardless of its worth!

    “I do not know the company. I know nothing about the company other than the people who run the company … I’m not familiar with what they do or how they go about doing that, and I make that clear in all my speeches”—Donald Trump, WSJ interview:
    Well, he doesn’t “make that clear in all [his] speeches” as the following video shows—just the opposite is the case:

    In 2012, George Will accurately described Drumpf as “a bloviating ignoramus”.

    The Many Scandals of Donald Trump

    Donald Trump: A True Narcissistic Sociopath (1:19:10)
    A documented history of the world’s greatest confidence man—1.5 hours of—Yuk!

    “Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard.”—H.L. Mencken (1915)
    Under “Don the Con” the common people are certainly going to get it good and hard this time. …

    Donald Drumpf is such a “great” businessman: among his many documented failures, we now know he claimed a $915 million loss in 1995, and as a consequence of that massive loss—that appears to have been the loss of bond holders and not an actual loss by Drumpf himself (video at )—he has apparently paid little or no income tax since. In that same year, he claimed an income of only $3.4 million, which suggests that he is indeed worth nothing like what he claims (video at ).

    Financial institutions don’t lend large sums without seeing certified accounting records and tax returns. Why is it then that people are prepared to accept at face value the constant stream of gross fabulations from this crass con man, and give him the keys to the US Treasury, without demanding the same substantiation?

    The Blind Trust. I’m still waiting to hear how Drumpf is going to put all of his business assets into a “blind trust”. Apparently, no one has yet explained to President-elect Groper just what a “blind trust” is and how they actually work; ie, that all the business assets have to be sold off and the resulting funds reinvested into assets of which only an independent trustee—not family members—has knowledge.

    Regretfully, like his tax returns that he promised but never delivered, I suspect the only “blind trust” we are ever going to see is that expressed in the Great Orange Groper by the hordes of his adoring “poorly educated”—that he so cynically claims to love.

    “No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public.”—H.L. Mencken (1926)
    Certainly, not George Will’s “bloviating ignoramus” Donald Drumpf …

    “I love the poorly educated!”—Donald Trump (2016)

  • dana daddee

    um, no.

  • dana daddee

    they’re lying.

  • dana daddee

    most of the right blah blah blah… bullshit.

  • dana daddee

    inept, or bankrupt…

  • dana daddee

    it’s what liberals do, man…

  • dana daddee

    what was hacked? what proof has been given that it was russia?

    any govt servers involved?

  • Karlie Schaefer
  • PT

    Looks like it../

  • PT


  • ScorpioMommy68

    Yeah, no. It’s called Obamacare.

  • craigzimmerman12

    Obama can talk all he wants, but he can’t overturn an election.

  • oldtack

    I was a frequent replier to discussions on this site until I left the county a couple of years ago. At that time there was intelligent dialog and a good exchange of thoughts and facts
    . Today, I just finished a good cup of coffee while reading the 106 discussions on this site.and I can unequivocally state that I have never read such a voluminous amount of empty worthless bullshit in all of my life. It reminds me of kindergartners screaming did -did not Liar Liar pants on fire. All of the real intelligence in these 106 entries could be compressed and it might fit the end of a pin.
    If you pin heads are going to enter into discussions do your selves a great favor – quit watching ALL of the Mass Media “coffee Klatch” talking heads. Quit readin Breitbart and all the other jerkheads that pose as news “experts” and USE you own Cognition. Research these assertions and denials and use your own inbred sense of reasoning to reach the truth or what you see as the truth and THEN engage in a good discussion on this Forum. There is a plethora of information out there for great and spirited AND informative discussions and not this kindergarten nya nya bullshit

  • oldtack

    There was a book a few years back “Thr Brothers” by Stephen Kinzer that is very good in exposing the origin and rise to powere of the CIA under Allen Dulles. It is a great Expose on the corruptness of this agency that replaced the OSS.

  • oldtack

    Hey bozo – where is the proof to back up your statements. Is there and facts or is this just some rattlings from the inside of an empty brain cavity?

  • Buddy_Rogers

    If it was up your ass you’d know where it was.
    Is English your second language or does 5 o’clock come early at your house or whatever other filthy place you call home?

  • oldtack

    Ah Mr Rogers your true nature doth reveal itself. Just “scratch” your surface and all the unintelligent uttering gush forth. Nothing intelligent. Nothing factual to back up your allegations . Just some profanity and incomprehensble utterances. Like grunts from an imbecile
    . Meanwhile – have a great holiday and -when you post something that has fact in it I will be more than happy to engage you in meaningful dialog.

  • Buddy_Rogers

    You should learn how to communicate.
    No one has any idea which of my 6745 comments you’re referencing.or what specific part makes your whiny ass need a comfort substance.
    Once you start drinking put your kb away.

  • Toby Grutnzler

    “Meaningful dialogue”…? Do you mean like addressing someone as bozo out of the gate? Why don’t you cram your empty, zit-crusted head back up your ass, you halfwit dunce. Better yet, get back to slobbering on your boyfriend’s dick. Wipe that man gravy off your chin and swab the shit out of your ears, you panty-waisted pussy.

  • Andrew Ryan

    Of course I can tell the difference between butthurt birthirism and people scared of tyrannical Trump. That we’re being lied to by Trump was obvious right from the start – it’s not something I had to ‘figure out’. And immature yourself.

  • ScorpioMommy68

    You are sadly hopeless. So much information has come out and you remain a sheeple. Once again – Good luck sucker!

  • Andrew Ryan

    Right! And Trumplethinskin wants theatres to be safe spaces for poor Pence.

  • Andrew Ryan

    Good job no-one’s doing that, then, eh? But thanks for calling the KGB on me.

  • Andrew Ryan

    Likewise to you. Enjoy your new leader, comrade sheeple (and I don’t mean Trumplethinskin).

  • MrSnuggles2k2

    Hahha thats what you are advocating you moron. If you dont want a visit dont break the law

  • Andrew Ryan

    When did I advocate that, Comrade Snuggles? And perhaps learn to use apostrophes – calling other people moron when you write like a five-year-old makes you look like a dumbass.

  • MrSnuggles2k2

    pardon me, i did not realize you arent an american, so you are right it wouldnt be treason. you can go fuck yourself instead!

  • Andrew Ryan

    I’ll ask again: “When did I advocate that, Comrade Snuggles?”
    Tellingly, last time I asked that, all you had in reply was swearing. You’re probably not American either, so I won’t suggest you stand before the HUAC.

  • MrSnuggles2k2

    you are obviously butt hurt that trump won, your sour grapes “well what if its overturned, will you suck it up?” whining is a major tell

  • Andrew Ryan

    No, I find it hilarious that Trump won. Seeing the reactions of the ‘drain the swamp’ brigade as Trump announces a bunch of Putin buddies and Goldman Sachs insiders is priceless. Half of the supporters are getting angry and realising they’ve been had and the other half are performing extraordinary contortions to justify what he’s done so far. And if questioning the electoral college system is treason then bring that up with Trump himself, who was calling it a ‘disaster for democracy’ four years ago when he mistakenly thought Obama was going to lose the popular vote yet win the presidency. His hypocrisy is extraordinary and shameless!

  • MrSnuggles2k2

    He hasnt been sworn in yet, calm down

  • Andrew Ryan

    “He hasnt been sworn in yet”
    I know, and yet look at how much he’s screwed up already! The leader of the supposed party of small government, and he’s falling over himself to praise the leader of Russia. Does this not concern you at all? If your answer is that it’s all about good diplomacy, then shouldn’t you be more concerned about him deliberately angering China?

  • MrSnuggles2k2

    screwed up by not biting on obamas lies and petulance?

    why do you want ww3?